EU Commissioner Hearings
04/11/2024 to 12/11/2024
What did EU Commissioner Michael McGrath say about the Digital Fairness Act?
Commissioner-designate Michael McGrath had already provided written responses to the European Parliament and gave further information on the Commission’s plan for the Digital Fairness Act during the hearing on Tuesday the 5th of November. He was questioned by the LIBE, IMCO, and JURI parliamentary committees.
McGrath's Vision for the Digital Fairness Act
Not Encroaching on Existing Laws: McGrath Emphasised that the DFA will not duplicate existing legislation but will address specific areas lacking consumer protection in the digital realm.
Targeted Issues: The Act will tackle dark patterns, misleading marketing by social media influencers, addictive design of digital products, and unfair personalization practices.
Protection of Minors: A significant focus will be on safeguarding children from harmful content and manipulative practices online.
Digital Subscriptions: McGrath acknowledged concerns about the difficulty of cancelling digital subscriptions compared to signing up, committing to address this imbalance.
Protecting Minors Online
MEP Dóra Dávid's Question
Highlighted that minors face unique risks online, as the internet was not designed with children in mind.
Asked McGrath what actions he will take to protect minors, the scope and timeline of these actions, and how he will ensure effective cooperation between authorities for swift enforcement.
McGrath's Response
Acknowledgment of Priority: Agreed on the importance of protecting minors and committed to working with MEPs on this issue.
Addressing Gaps: Stated that the DFA will fill gaps not covered by existing legislation, such as issues in video games.
Specific Concerns:
In-App Purchases: Noted problems with the sale of virtual items using in-app currencies.
Gambling Features: Expressed concern over gambling-simulating features like loot boxes, which may have long-term impacts on children.
Influencer Oversight: Mentioned that many social media influencers promote harmful products to young audiences, suggesting a need for regulation.
Future Actions: Plans to present a scientific study on marketing techniques affecting children's purchasing behaviour in online games.
Simplification and Avoiding Duplication
MEP Svenja Hahn's Question
Emphasised the need for simplification and reduction of bureaucracy in new legislation.
Asked how McGrath plans to develop the DFA without duplicating existing laws and where he sees potential to cut red tape.
McGrath's Response
Contribution to Simplification: Believes the DFA can simplify existing regulations by addressing unregulated areas rather than adding layers to current laws.
Identified Opportunities: Simplifying information obligations for digital content purchases, as found in the recent digital fitness check.
Avoiding Duplication: Assured that the DFA will not replicate existing legislation but will cover missing aspects crucial for consumer protection.
Benefits for All: Emphasised that simplification will benefit both consumers and businesses.
Addressing Addictive Design and Big Tech
MEP Katarina Barley's Question
Asked if McGrath commits to include concrete legislation to protect Europeans from addictive designs.
Inquired whether he is prepared to tackle the business models of big tech companies.
McGrath's Response
Concrete Measures: Confirmed that the DFA will include specific actions against addictive design features.
Examples of Harmful Features: Identified infinite scroll, autoplay, and constant notifications as designs that require attention.
Acknowledgment of Complexity: Admitted that while challenging, regulating these features is necessary.
Additional Initiatives:
Mentioned an EU-wide inquiry on social media's impact on well-being.
Stressed the importance of using the Digital Services Act to ensure large platforms protect minors.
Protecting All Consumers from Addictive Design
MEP Kim van Sparrentak's Question
Highlighted that addictive design affects consumers of all ages.
Asked if the DFA will include binding rules against addictive designs for everyone and ban features like endless scroll and autoplay.
McGrath's Response
Inclusive Protection: Affirmed that the DFA will cover all consumers, with special attention to minors.
Understanding of Business Models: Recognized that big tech designs platforms to keep users engaged for advertising revenue.
Commitment to Action: Emphasised the necessity of addressing harmful functionalities despite the complexity.
Dynamic Pricing and Transparency
MEP Pierfrancesco Maran's Question
Raised concerns about dynamic pricing, citing the example of Oasis concert ticket sales.
Asked if McGrath would regulate dynamic pricing in the DFA, especially in culture and entertainment.
Brought up the issue of shrinkflation, where product quantity or quality decreases without a price change.
McGrath's Response
Dynamic Pricing:
Acknowledged that while dynamic pricing isn't prohibited, aspects could be unfair to consumers.
Expressed willingness to examine solutions within the DFA.
Shrinkflation:
Highlighted the importance of the Price Indication Directive, which requires transparency on pricing.
Recognized the need for full transparency when product quality or composition changes.
Enforcement: Noted that powers exist at the national level to address these issues but is open to enhancing EU-level regulations if necessary.
Other Hearing to Keep an Eye on
It is also possible that Commissioners-designate Henna Virkkunen may also talk about the commission’s plan on the Digital Fairness Act as well since she has made brief references to the upcoming regulation in her pre-hearing written response. She stated that she intends to support McGrath on the Digital Fairness Act.
Virkkunen’s hearing will take place on Tuesday 12 November from 18.30 to 21.30 (CET).
This page will be updated after the hearings with all information relevant to the Digital Fairness Act.